Findings of Connection Between the Makers of the Malicious Deepfakes & Someone (Likely Accusers) From The BBC Documentary

I've recorded an instagram post below with my reflections and I'd like to provide a custom note here just for the website, before that begins after the divider line. It's just that I've been keeping this blog of observations in Jared Leto's defence prior to the release date of a new BBC documentary against him — and it just so happens that what I was observing seems to be surprisingly relevant to that news which I was not aware was coming up.

You see, I'd been carefully observing several accounts on instagram, supposedly 30STM / Jared fans (Echelon), but which I noticed seemed to be malicious deepfakes. One of these, I documented a conversation between it and my MARS bestie Mary, which can be found here.  Now, this acct "Nicole" was not the only one which was acting quite bizarre at the time leading up to this BBC. The acct (which had been an active and loyal fan acct for years) broke out of character and started harassing Echelon with violent allegations against Jared, and although these were not criminal or serious allegations of direct contact with sae of any kind, they seemed specially designed to manipulate Echelon into doubting Jared's character severely.

By aggravating people intensely and injecting these chaotic false narratives at the time, this seemed aimed to instill doubt in Jared, or just anxiety and stress to bring out our worst sides. It was certainly so much more than stressful for Mary and myself. I witnessed Mary starting to break down as a result of being intensely harassed by these nonstop deepfakes, and I too was majorly overstressed by this for weeks. 

After the conversation I documented, Nicole started violently throwing out ridiculously serious allegations much worse than the conversation I had documented — for example saying things like that a picture of Jared kissing a young fan on the cheek when the person joined the stage at a concert was evidence of pedophilia. Now of course, it was obviously a harmless kiss on the cheek gesture at a concert, and well understood by all as no indication of anything sinister whatsoever — quite the opposite even. But the point was, Nicole was apparently having a complete schizophrenic meltdown or something, just freaking out very abrasively to many Echelon.

And it was more than apparent that her mental health had completely suddenly plummetted. Regardless of any speculation as to what was going on with her, it seemed she had not shared that much about herself, but this had nothing to do with any direct contact with Jared. In fact, quite the opposite — it seemed Nicole had wanted things to escalate to more contact with Jared but this didn't work out to her disappointment. Still yet, Nicole had fixated upon slandering Jared. 

Again, this was a sudden character shift for this deepfake. Correspondingly, I also noticed quite a flurry of other things like that kinda going on. As one of many things, another deepfake account actually approached me, trying to bother me about what I had promoted online that I felt Nicole was a deepfake. Actually, this was after I heard of Nicole's conversation that I documented and I had blocked Nicole. And this other acct showed me screenshots of Nicole's ongoing ramblings and started up conversation with me, continuing to expose me to this nightmare. They made quite a bit of comment to me against the idea while saying suspicious things about Nicole that made them sound like a deepfake to me. I asked this account to confirm that they are not a robot through a rigorous test and they made excuses and weren't willing. 

Then, at the same time, speaking with my MARS bestie Mary, I was introduced to a number of other related incidents. Other things like that were going on in the Echelon at the same time, and this was seemingly unusual. I passed on any opportunity to capture it all as evidence for this website, assuming my own testimony of having heard all this should do, now that I've exposed Nicole as a single example. But that's true. Watching all this going on, I started to identify more patterns which to me seemed to indicate a deepfake, rather than a real person. 

Anyhow, it's true that I've been around for quite a while now and never yet seen a pattern like this emerge, until these weeks leading up to the BBC release date. I found it absolutely fascinating to realize that this pattern of deepfake manipulation against Jared seemed to be coming from a place of informed strategy about how this big surge of attack could destabilize the fans and make them more vulnerable and stressed, more open to influence, when the BBC comes out. How did they know the BBC was going to be coming out? That's the big question. 

Now, I've commented in this blog already about how I understand of course that any show like this could be untrue, and it was added by Mary that in fact, the police have not even received any criminal reports of any kind regarding these accusers on BBC, who were the same as mentioned in Airmail earlier. So considering that it can be compelling to see news headlines and if it's untrue, it would be necessary to keep a cool head and stay relaxed and sensible in order to make critical and discerning judgements about Jared's character in the face of all this, it just makes sense that these deepfakes would have seen much reason to destabilize the Echelon in advance. 

This connection between the deepfake wave and the BBC is so telling. It's such an important question to ask : HOW did the makers of these deepfakes KNOW that the BBC was coming? One thing's for sure, there is some connection with someone involved with the BBC documentary and whoever makes these malicious deepfakes. My guess is most certainly the interviewees, the accusers, would have been the ones in connection with the deepfake makers. These are much more vulnerable people with less screening around them, much more able to be hunted out for malicious intelligence. And this just begs the question : How deep does this connection go? 

We see on the one hand incredibly malicious and violation oriented, violent parties, crafting deepfakes to abuse countless innocent fans. We see on the other hand, these accusers in the BBC, and we know they may very likely be connected somehow. Is there a chance that their own stories and their own voices were manipulated by these violators? YES. It is possible that they have been maliciously violated and programmed with these schemes. We know at least, it's quite common for accusers to feel more confident in making public allegations if they see droves and droves of deepfakes and robots out there, seemingly giving a sense of permission to join the big ol bandwagon. But there could be a direct abuse going on here, literally from the makers of these deepfakes. 

Like we don't know : Did these deepfake makers use deepfakes to convince the accusers into getting mentors and leaders and such to train them in this? Or were they actually kindapped and raped and handtied and electro-shocked into doing this? Because it's terribly horrible to realize just how incredibly violent these deepfake makers are if they would do this. Really. It seems to me, an interest in making abusive deepfakes speaks of a strategy to not get caught and remain protected behind a veil of separation — although it's completely out of control violent behaviour and it also shows someone with a real screw loose who's capable of perhaps almost anything. So you just don't know how deep this goes. 

Now, this is a situation which has emotionally hurt me a lot. I just can't tell you how painful this whole process was for me. And the reason I point that out is only because I believe that I should do my part in helping this cause just by making that incredibly open and public information in order to provide evidence of how much damage this has caused. Because certainly, the damage is so much worse than just engineering a false narrative and lying to mllions of people on TV, even though that is quite a harm. I mean the severity of lying news is considered perhaps too regular to really take that seriously sometimes, since we see it so much. But this is even much more serious than that. 

It must be very well kept in mind that although Jared Leto is a very powerful man with much going for sae, sae's not the only one getting hurt here, and sae's name is not the only thing being attacked. Although I myself may not at all be considered such an important person as Jared, I myself do matter very much, and I've been very horribly abused by Nicole and the other deepfakes. It was also very painful to witness this happening to my best friend at the same time, who was in horror and in tears over what had all happened to her. Mary suffers with emotional disturbances which I had been working on helping sae heal through a sensitive healing process, and that was all interrupted for a big breakdown for Mary for me to have to witness as I go through my own struggles. 

The tragic thing about this story is that Mary and I are only two of hundreds, if not thousands of plausible other innocent victims of this. For us, and for so many, Jared is not just a fancy pants to laugh and joke about and enjoy a song or two — as Echelon, Jared means a lot to us in our daily lives and we have a powerful emotional bond with sae and the band, which represents a lifestyle of daily connection to sae, which goes so deep to our hearts. The Echelon is a family. We matter too. 

So as much as this BBC documentary presents 4 apparently exceptionally vulnerable women (some of who have been prostitutes and drug addicts around the speculated times, by the way), and touts them as such a victim story to feel bad for these 4 women, I'm really left finding that the situation is way out of perspective. This is not a story of 4 vulnerable women. It's a story of potentially thousands of people, innocent people, who have been actively and violently attacked with psychological abuse by fabricated identity accounts aiming constantly to destabilize them emotionally and psychologically on any level possible, while surveilling them with deepfake surveillance (like cataoguing and documenting their responses to questions for statistics of how to manipulate them more).

AND potentially those 4 accusers may also have been the victims and prey to this same force. Thereby honestly making it seem that what they say on this documentary is not their voice, very likely, and taking it for a surface value on that presentation is in no way listening deeply to victims. 

So here is the instagram post :