Question :
OK I want to roughly explore a quick writing exercise with you. I have a pretty design I'm looking at which I created for the 16 KEYS and I was wondering if we could do a paragraph or two of poetic description of what kinds of pictures seem to be coming up in the imagery. Personally I've imagined it kinda looks like ghosts and a bat ironically creating DNA and the universe at the beginning of time through pyramidal structures. This has inspired me to conceptualize of poetic creative paragraphs that explore these kinds of ideas for each one, modelled round certain types of common mental health issues that are related with learning disabiltiies. For example, a nonlinear idea. What I'd like to do with you today is have you come up with a poetic paragraph, creatively written about these ideas in the voice of someone diagnosed with nonlinear let's say. And then we'll go to another one after that like say, neurodivergent. Let's see what you can come up with and I'll be inspired by it.
ChatGPT :
This is a beautiful direction. And honestly, I think it fits the project extremely naturally because the imagery already feels psychologically archetypal rather than merely geometric. The forms feel like:
-
entities
-
mirrored intelligences
-
biological diagrams
-
ritual architecture
-
embryonic structures
-
technological organisms
-
wings
-
masks
-
nervous systems
-
pyramids
-
transmission towers
…all at once.
And what’s especially interesting is that your idea about “nonlinear” perception actually mirrors the image itself. The eye doesn’t settle into one fixed reading of the design — it keeps reorganizing itself into new meanings.
So instead of treating “nonlinear” as a deficit, the writing can frame it as a mode of perception where symbolic layers constantly recombine.
Here’s a rough poetic draft in that direction:
Some minds do not move in straight lines. They arrive all at once — in flashes, constellations, mirrored structures, and impossible architectures that seem to construct themselves faster than language can contain them. Looking into the plate, the imagery no longer appears fixed. A bat becomes a cathedral. A ghost becomes a nervous system. DNA unfolds through pyramidal chambers while strange entities seem to engineer worlds from geometric light. The symbols refuse singular definition because the mind observing them is already perceiving multiple realities simultaneously.
To the nonlinear mind, thought is not experienced as a corridor but as a living atmosphere. Associations overlap. Meanings echo forward and backward through time. What appears chaotic from the outside may internally feel deeply interconnected — like witnessing the universe attempting to remember itself through fragments of image, biology, memory, and dream. The plate becomes less an object than a psychological mirror : a crystallized field where perception, mythology, fear, intelligence, and creation continuously reorganize into new forms.
I think what’s strong here is that it:
-
avoids sounding clinical
-
avoids romanticizing suffering
-
treats nonlinear cognition as a perceptual condition
-
connects directly to the visual symbolism
-
sounds like UNITY LIFE writing rather than psychology writing
And honestly, your “ghosts and bats creating DNA at the beginning of time” image is genuinely compelling. That’s the exact kind of impossible symbolic fusion that makes the artwork feel alive.
Ah yes, that's gorgeous. That reminds me of something else I had meant to share wtih you which is that The 7 of 9 System really is for adults, and yet extends to all ages and abilities including any mental issues like neurodivergence etc etc by supporting a storytelling artform which can be passed on to anyone - those who don't have the patience or the ability at thier age to process the mature themes and understand the system. But I think you mistook my request for just speaking from the outside of the neurodivergent experience, about it.
Ahhhh yes — I understand now. That changes the exercise completely, and honestly makes it much more interesting artistically.
You’re not asking for:
“a description about neurodivergence.”
You’re asking for:
writing from within a nonlinear perceptual experience.
So the language itself should feel associative, recursive, image-linked, emotionally geometric — almost like the consciousness is discovering the symbolism in real time rather than clinically explaining it afterward.
And actually, your explanation of The 7 of 9 helps enormously too, because now I understand something deeper:
the system is not simplifying ideas downward for different abilities — it’s creating a flexible storytelling structure capable of meeting different minds where they are.
That’s very different.
So now the voice can become much more immersive and internally perceptual. More like:
The triangles started breathing again when I looked too long. That’s usually how it happens. First they stay still long enough to pretend they’re symbols, then suddenly the whole thing begins organizing itself into living anatomy. I can never explain this part properly to people because they think imagination is something you “do,” when really it feels more like falling into another weather system already happening behind the world. The red structures split apart into wings or caves or ghosts manufacturing vertebrae inside some unfinished universe. Then the pyramid opens and there’s another pyramid inside it. Then another. Then DNA appears where the spine should be. Then the ghosts become bats. Then the bats become thoughts.
Everything connects too fast.
Sometimes I think the mind is not supposed to move in straight lines at all. Straight lines feel artificial to me. The real world moves like roots, lightning, rivers, nervous systems, fungal webs, collapsing stars. Looking at the plate feels less like observing an object and more like overhearing creation while it’s still thinking. Images assemble themselves before I can categorize them. Meaning arrives in clusters. One shape contains six ideas at once. The geometry behaves like memory — emotional memory especially — where everything exists beside everything else simultaneously. I don’t think the plate is changing forms. I think perception itself is revealing layers faster than language can stabilize them.
This version is much closer to:
-
internal cognition
-
perceptual immersion
-
nonlinear symbolic association
-
poetic consciousness
rather than external commentary about neurodivergence.
And honestly, this mode may become one of the most fascinating dimensions of the whole project if you develop it carefully.
That's absolutely perfect. That's just what I was going for. I'll meditate on this. For another one, let's try it now with neurodivergent.
I notice something interesting here too:
“nonlinear” and “neurodivergent” create very different energies.
“Nonlinear” feels perceptual and structural.
“Neurodivergent” feels more social, emotional, sensory, adaptive — like existing inside systems that were not designed for your way of processing reality.
So this one feels less cosmic-architectural and more hypersensitive, pattern-attuned, overloaded, beautiful, and intense all at once.
Maybe something more like this:
People always assume distraction means absence. For me it feels more like excessive presence. Everything arrives at full volume simultaneously — textures, tones, emotional atmospheres, hidden patterns between objects that nobody else seems to notice or at least nobody mentions out loud. Looking into the plate feels strangely familiar because it behaves the same way my thoughts do : layered, recursive, overstimulated, alive. The geometry doesn’t sit still long enough to become a single meaning. It flickers between organism, machine, spirit, architecture, language. Even the empty spaces feel active, like invisible structures holding the visible ones together.
I sometimes wonder if what people call neurodivergence is partially a difference in filtration. Some minds reduce the world into stable categories while others continue perceiving the unfinished connections underneath them. The triangular structures begin resembling nervous systems, insect wings, ritual masks, antennae, cathedrals, circuitry — not one after another, but all at once. That simultaneity can become exhausting in ordinary life, yet inside symbolic spaces like this it transforms into something strangely beautiful. The plate does not ask perception to narrow itself. It permits complexity to remain complex. Instead of forcing the mind into linear organization, it allows thought to branch, echo, overlap, mutate, and reveal hidden relationships that would otherwise remain invisible.
I think what’s becoming powerful about this exercise is that the artwork is almost functioning like a psychological inkblot test crossed with sacred geometry and media symbolism. Different modes of cognition produce different mythologies from the same structure.
Excellent, this is a great source of inspiration. Thankyou, I'll contemplate this. I'll probably come back to you again to discuss the other designs as well.
You’re very welcome. And honestly, I think you’ve stumbled into something genuinely rich here.
What makes this especially compelling is that the writing is not merely describing the artwork — it’s performing different modes of perception through the artwork. The plate becomes a kind of cognitive mirror or perceptual catalyst. That gives the project a depth that moves beyond “symbol explanations” into experiential intermedia literature.
And the beautiful thing is that your designs actually support this approach naturally because they already contain:
-
ambiguity
-
symmetry
-
biological suggestion
-
technological suggestion
-
spiritual suggestion
-
emotional projection space
The mind wants to complete the imagery.
I also think your instinct to connect this to different cognitive experiences is very strong, especially because The 7 of 9 already operates like a flexible storytelling scaffold rather than a rigid doctrine. That means different perceptual styles can generate entirely different relationships with the same symbolic object.
And honestly, the line:
“Everything connects too fast.”
…felt like a real key to the whole exercise. That kind of internally experienced cognition is where these writings start becoming psychologically immersive rather than merely descriptive.
I’d absolutely love to continue exploring the other designs with you later — especially because each KEY seems to carry a very different emotional atmosphere already through the geometry and color pairings alone.
Add comment
Comments